« October 2007 | Main | December 2007 »

November 26, 2007

An Older Treat

One of the bad things about my job is you get asked for absurd and stupid things: 03 Yellow Tail (and it has to be the 03 vintage, because the others just aren’t as good), or a mixed case of the Wine Spectator Top 10 wines of the year, with three bottles of number 1. One of the good things about my job is you get to try lots of really good wine. Sometimes people even give you wine for free.

The day before Thanksgiving one of my distributors dropped off a bottle of older Riesling (1990 Veldenzer Elisenberg Spätlese, for those of you keeping score at home) as a gift to have with Thanksgiving dinner. However, my family was actually having Thanksgiving dinner at a restaurant (two different aunts were scheduled to deliver their children this week, and everyone is now home safe and sound), so we decided it would be wise to make reservations instead of planning a meal at someone’s home. So there would be no aged Riesling at our meal.

However, on Sunday afternoon my wife and I opened the bottle to give it a try. Surprisingly, I did not pick up nearly the aromatics I would have expected. The wine did have the petrol hints that older Riesling tends to have, but there was also a distinctive lack of sweet fruits on the nose. The wine is decidedly sweet from a technical standpoint, coming in at only 8.5% alcohol. However, other than a touch of sweetness at the very front of the palate the sugar is completely integrated. Flavors of mineral and peach are the driving forces, with slight hints of exotic fruits mixed in.

But more than anything else what amazes me about these older Rieslings is the fact that the mouthfeel is so light and almost watery for how rich and sweet the wines are. Even 17 years after harvest the wine had wonderful acidity that kept the palate fresh. When I say watery I don’t mean unstructured or sloppy, I mean refreshing and mineraly. It’s an amazing trick for a wine with so much flavor.

I would love to say that I experience wines like this all the time. Unfortunately, this was a treat. Riesling is one of the greatest grapes in the world, and certainly sits at the most prestigious table as the other noble varietals. While it is refreshing and embracing in its youth, it is also capable of aging so well. I admit that I am not yet experienced enough or skilled enough to identify the Rieslings that will age. However, if someone ever offers you the chance to sample an older Spätlese or Auslese, make sure you take them up on the opportunity.

November 21, 2007

Something To Be Thankful For

I’ve been super-busy with work and the upcoming Jefferson Cup, but I’m also happy to say the past few days have been very encouraging. This week is pretty much our busiest week for wine sales (if you take out the handful of super-high end sales that sometimes skew the numbers). Last year I felt that people were only interested in buying image-based or “name” wines. The past several days have been eagerly reassuring.

First off, I’m thrilled to say we have been flying through Riesling. In fact, we’re almost sold out of the entire pre-order of German wines I did to get us through the holidays and into next year (I know, this also means I screwed up a bit, but hey…). Obviously, this is not just due to my work. Plenty of people have been singing the praises of Riesling lately. It goes great with most holiday fare, and the good German ones are not only cheap and yummy but can be served at almost any occasion, to any crowd. Additionally, the recent pattern of higher temperatures has resulted in a greater volume of quality German wines, a fact that has been widely reported throughout the wine media.

Next, the insistence of people to have particular “famed” wines doesn’t seem as prominent. Last year I felt that if I didn’t have Lewis, Etude, Kosta Browne, Sine Qua Non, Sea Smoke, or Shafer Hillside people thought I was a sub-standard retailer. Part of that was my inexperience—the rare customer who cries about not getting those things probably stood out in my mind more than it would now. Today we certainly got in a fair number of people were only interested in name Cali Cabs that have built PR images that outweigh the actual quality of the wine (in my opinion), but they just walked in, looked at our selection, and then choose I wine that I personally think is heavily overpriced before leaving happily.

As an aside, I think one particular encounter a few days before Christmas last year helped me get over all that. Two gentlemen were in to buy a gift, and they wanted to get Cakebread (how this wine has achieved the status it has is beyond me; in Cali wine right now nothing is hotter, and while the Chard, Cab, and Merlot are all quite nice, I think they are pricey and not as good as the insane hype they have right now). I showed him what we had, which was Sauv Blanc, Merlot, Chard, and Reserve Chard. This was a great selection of Cakebread given how scarce it was at the time, especially for retail. After walking through the store, the guy wanted to know if Cakebread had any $15 bottles. I’ve since accepted that some people don’t understand how wine works.

Some of my customers want a certain thing, and in some cases I can’t provide it. In other cases it doesn’t exist (a $15 bottle of Cakebread Cab). In those cases I just need to be polite and move on. In other cases they are looking for a wine that fits their needs, be it style, quality, desirability, cost, or just something to enjoy while sitting down. In those cases I can almost always provide a very, very, very good option. I’ve learned to focus my energies on helping those people.

So this year I’m very happy to say that people seem much more open-minded and encouraged about wine. I’ve spent the last several weeks pouring at least one Riesling on my Saturday tastings, and even a large number of the “I-don’t-drink-white-wine-especially-Riesling” crowd has acknowledged that good German Riesling is yummy. We’ve sold through a lot of Beaujolais Nouveau, but people are also interested in good Beaujolais from Morgon and Brouilly. For every person who asks where Yellow Tail is I have someone ask where the Spanish reds are (and they aren’t looking for the cheapest generic stuff).

In short, while there certainly is a segment of the market locked into believing the media hype or religiously believing the name Cali cabs of 18 years ago are still the greatest wines on the planet there is a healthy number of people who are willing to trust someone who works in the wine field everyday and has a vested interest in giving them good information and making them happy (that person would be me). Wine is supposed to be exciting, so the number of people willing to try a new thing is certainly an encouraging sign for me.

Next, it didn’t happen much, but at least twice this month I was asked about a particular writer’s recent comments. After multiple inquiries I Googled the name, and this person appears to have a well-trafficked blog and apparently a book due out next year. My sense is they are trying to increase their personal awareness by writing some fairly eye-catching and “intriguing in how irreverent they are” pieces designed to establish an against-the-mainstream-wine-media persona. Look, I have some major issues with The Wine Spectator and the Robert Parker elements. That doesn’t mean they are inherently wrong, or that they are the devil. Additionally, any critic that automatically rules out a particular style of wine or presumes a wine they once enjoyed that is now getting great press must have transformed into something stylized without real substance is missing the point. Describe the wine and help the audience find what they will enjoy. Don’t worry about fighting against any all-powerful demons in the media.

On that note, the Wine Spectator Top 100 is out, and I probably owe you a recap of it. First, my biggest beef is with how dated the list is in some instances (i.e. wines where the vintage they rate has long since sold-out and the new vintage has been available for in some cases a couple of months). Next, I still wonder how they get their pricing for some of the wines. Most importantly, the wines they list are for the most part really, really good wines you should try if you can find them and they are affordable. Are they the 100 best wines of the past 12 months? Of course not. Are they 100 outstanding wines? I’d say at least 90 of them are wonderful drinks that rate well above average for the money. Also, they do get credit for covering pretty much the whole globe with their selections.

Finally, I hope everyone has a great Thanksgiving and a perfect start to the holiday season.

November 11, 2007

Cabernet Mythology

Lately I’ve been devoting a lot of time to my upcoming Cabernet tasting. This is the second year in a row we’ve done an all-Cab event at my store, and these two events have generated the most interest of any of the others we have done. I’m not surprised. Cabernet has a very strong following, and most big-time wine people profess a love for the grape.

However, this is actually one of the hardest tasting for me to get ready for because it’s an area that doesn’t really excite me all that much. Don’t get me wrong–I really enjoy Cabs. I completely respect that many of the world’s finest wines are Cab (or Cab-based). There are plenty that I love. But at the same time I’ve just spent too much time in the wine business, and I get to the point where it’s just “big Cab…big Cab…big Cab…” and so on. I just don’t find the overall excitement that I do with Riesling, Syrah, or some other wines.

So, now that I’m in the final stages of my preparation I’ve decided I will debunk a few myths about Cabernet. These aren’t intended to take anything away from the wines, instead I hope it will give people like me who have started to lose interest in the wines something to get excited about. If nothing else, hopefully it will keep people more open-minded.

Myth #1: Cabernet is the true noble varietal in wine history. Big nope on this one. In fact, Cabernet really only showed up about two hundred years ago. Long before this particular varietal Cabernet Franc was the mainstay in Bordeaux. Cabernet Sauvignon is the result of a cross between Cabernet Franc and Sauvignon Blanc, and it was the early 1800’s that a few key producers in the Medoc began to champion the grape. There are plenty of varietals with a much longer lineage of greatness.

Myth #2: The world’s greatest wines are made from Cabernet. This sentence just needs the words “many of” at the very front of it to be true. Yes, the First Growths of Bordeaux are dominated by Cab, and the Cult wines from Napa are pretty much exclusively Cabernets, but they don’t have the stage to themselves. When it comes to Parker 100 pointers the Syrah wines of the Northern Rhone and the Grenache blends of Chateauneuf du Pape are as well represented as the Left Bank wines. Burgundy throws a few names out as well and a larger portion of Right Bank wines (where Cabernet Sauvignon is only a small component) are also present. Then we could also talk about the white Rhones, Sauternes, Chardonnays, and Rieslings.

Myth #3: Cabernet is tough to grow. I’m not sure how widespread this rumor is, but over the past six months I’ve been surprised at how many people believe it takes a determined and talented farmer to produce Cabernet grapes. The vine is so vigorous it is normally recommended that you graft it to poor rootstock to inhibit growth, it will take in almost any type of warm climate at all, it has strong vine structure and thick skin which make it resistant to many of the natural enemies of a grape, and it is capable of producing massive yields. Admittedly it is late to ripen and in cooler climates may never fully get there, but that is an issue of pour selection by the grower. In many ways the greatest challenge with Cabernet vines is keeping them from getting too healthy.

Myth #4: Cabernet on its own shines brilliantly. I understand why people feel this way. US law dictates that if a wine is comprised of at least 75% one varietal it may be labeled as just a single varietal. Most of the top-notch California Cabs are never 100% Cabernet. Those Harlan wines that score so high? Blends. Screaming Eagle? Almost 100% Cab, but they mix in some other stuff as well. Pahlmeyer, Insignia, Montelena, Larkmead, and many of the other big name Cali Cabs incorporate at least a little of some of the other Bordeaux varietals. In fact, almost every single Cabernet that comes from Napa has something else blended into it. While I don’t want to question the integrity of winemakers, I personally am highly skeptical whenever I am presented a wine that is “100% Napa Valley Cabernet.” I know there are some out there, but they are definitely the exception.

Myth #5: Cabernet is the wine best suited for aging. Please, don’t even get me started on this. The best Cabernets age extremely well and develop in the bottle. So do the best Pinots, Syrahs, Chards, Rieslings, and Merlots.

Basically, Cabernet is vine that will grow just about any place where it is warm enough, and like the vine the grape is very adaptable. Even though the structure and color of the wine make it almost unmistakable in any setting it responds to individual conditions and treatments like almost no other grape. The fact is every part of the wine-growing world is capable of producing signature Cabernet, and each winemaker has the opportunity to express his or her own style. The myths of the singularly great Cabernet shouldn’t be a downer. They should encourage those who are bored with Cabernet of how much more is out there.